nanog mailing list archives

Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 08:21:07 +0200



On 1/Aug/18 00:15, Job Snijders wrote:

However, as you noted; multicast within a single administrative domain
(such as an access network distributing linear TV), or confined to
purpose-built L3VPNs very much is a thing. On the public Internet multicast
seems dead.


I'd concur.

Mark.

Current thread:

Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet, (continued)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet John Kristoff (Aug 01)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Justin M. Streiner (Aug 01)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Sean Donelan (Aug 02)
  - Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet John Levine (Aug 02)
    - Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Sean Donelan (Aug 02)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Aug 02)
  - Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Saku Ytti (Aug 02)
    - Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Saku Ytti (Aug 02)
    - RE: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Aug 02)
    - RE: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG (Aug 02)
- Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet Mark Tinka (Aug 02)