nanog mailing list archives

Re: [Nanog] BGPMon RPKI Validation Failed (Code: 9)


From: Job Snijders <job () instituut net>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 22:31:36 +0200

Dear Michel,

This question is probably best answered by Andree Toonk from the
BGPMon project. I've CCed him.

Kind regards,

Job

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:27 PM, Michel Py <michel.py () tsisemi com> wrote:
Hi Nanog,

I received recently some of these messages, and I don't understand the logic of them.
If there is no ROA found, the code should be 1, and the status unknown / not found.
What is the logic behind getting a Validation failure if there is no ROA ?

Please help RPKI n00b,
Thanks.


====================================================================

RPKI Validation Failed (Code: 9)

====================================================================

Your prefix:          216.230.25.0/24:

Prefix Description:   TSI Semiconductors

Update time:          2018-07-20 00:10 (UTC)

Detected by #peers:   4

Detected prefix:      216.230.25.0/24

Announced by:         AS14051 (Consolidated Communications, Inc.)

Upstream AS:          AS2914 (NTT America, Inc.)

ASpath:               25291 2914 14051

Alert details:        https://portal.bgpmon.net/alerts.php?details&alert_id=82315862

Mark as false alert:  https://portal.bgpmon.net/fp.php?aid=82315862

RPKI Status:          No ROA found

TSI Disclaimer:  This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for the recipients named above 
and contain information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not 
forward, copy, use or otherwise disclose this communication or the information contained herein. In the event you 
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, and then 
delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you!...


Current thread: