Re: What NMS do you use and why?

[Jon Wolberg <jonwolberg () gmail com>]

There are many other threads on this topic as well.  I can say +1 for
check_mk though.

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:24 AM Faisal Imtiaz <faisal () snappytelecom net>
wrote:

> Having done a full circle on the number of network monitoring packages,
> dealing with pro's and con's, we ended up with  using Check_mk, moreover
> OMD.... http://omdisto.org
>
> We found (OMD) this to be a very powerful combination of different
> packages, each can shine for it's own strength and other compliments it for
> for the weaknesses !
>
> Regards.
>
> Faisal Imtiaz
> Snappy Internet & Telecom
> http://www.snappytelecom.net
>
> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>
> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: Support () Snappytelecom net
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Colton Conor" <colton.conor () gmail com>
> *To: *"nanog list" <nanog () nanog org>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 15, 2018 9:49:12 AM
> *Subject: *What NMS do you use and why?
>
> We are looking for a new network monitoring system. Since there are so
> many operators on this list, I would like to know which NMS do you use and
> why? Is there one that you really like, and others that you hate?
> For free options (opensouce), LibreNMS and NetXMS come highly recommended
> by many wireless ISPs on low budgets. However, I am not sure the commercial
> options available nor their price points.