nanog mailing list archives

Re: Multicast traffic % in enterprise network ?


From: James Bensley <jwbensley () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:54:37 +0100

On 9 August 2018 at 13:57, Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi> wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 at 15:27, James Bensley <jwbensley () gmail com> wrote:

A recent customer uses multicast to have the same packet arrive at
multiple destinations at the same time for resilience (their own
internal systems, not IPTV or media etc). Having just refreshed their
network for the next 5-10 years it's not going away anytime soon.

I believe the same time delivery is motivation for stock exchanges
too. One of the larger exchanges used MX and multicast, which of
course does btree or utree (in this  case utree) replication, which
makes delivery times are very much variant.
So it is very much implementation detail what type of delivery time
differences to expect in different ports and it is not by design
superior to unicast.


I'm definately not saying it was a good idea / good design :)

I'm just saying that it's another example of multicast in use that is
not the usual IPTV or financial trading (aeronautical in this case).

Cheers,
James.


Current thread: