nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering at public exchange authentication
From: Dave Temkin <dave () temk in>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:25:08 -0700
Talks about GSRs and Sup720's, but still relevant today. https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog39/presentations/Scholl.pdf -Dave On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:05 AM, BRAD RAYMO <brad.raymo () gmail com> wrote:
Its up to you and how you want to manage your sessions. Some networks require it, some prefer it but do not require it, and others do not want to use it at all. On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 10:41 AM, craig washington < craigwashington01 () hotmail com> wrote:Hello all, Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at public exchange locations. Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta, do you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session? Ive seem some use it and some not use it, is it just a preference?
Current thread:
- Peering at public exchange authentication craig washington (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering at public exchange authentication Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering at public exchange authentication Bob Evans (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering at public exchange authentication Job Snijders (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering at public exchange authentication BRAD RAYMO (Sep 29)
- Re: Peering at public exchange authentication Dave Temkin (Sep 30)
- Re: Peering at public exchange authentication Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 29)