nanog mailing list archives

pd table vs 6296


From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:59:01 +0900

say i want to use pd to a fairly large aggregation.  the router has to
hold the pd table.  it sees some routers have limited table size, e.g.
1k.  so what's a poor boy to do?  the classic ipv4 solution would be
6296 <the horror!>.  are folk doing pd scaling?  how?

randy     


Current thread: