nanog mailing list archives
pd table vs 6296
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:59:01 +0900
say i want to use pd to a fairly large aggregation. the router has to hold the pd table. it sees some routers have limited table size, e.g. 1k. so what's a poor boy to do? the classic ipv4 solution would be 6296 <the horror!>. are folk doing pd scaling? how? randy
Current thread:
- pd table vs 6296 Randy Bush (Sep 21)
- Re: pd table vs 6296 joel jaeggli (Sep 22)