nanog mailing list archives

Re: Anyone from AT&T DNS?


From: Jay Farrell via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 04:12:30 -0400

Yep, the notation with the slash used to be ATT's standard method. At my
job (where we had some customers with ATT MIS T1 circuits) we transitioned
to a web front end for our DNS that didn't allow for the slash, so we had
to nudge ATT to allow us to use a dash notation instead for delegations.

As far as to what can appear in a DNS entry, you'd be amazed. I encountered
a PTR record containing a full URL, http:// and everything; it didn't
actually work of course, but bind allowed it to exist. When I tracked down
the cow-orker who had entered it, he said he knew it wasn't valid, but he
did it that way when the customer insisted it had to be thus. :-D

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matt Peterman <mpeterman () apple com> wrote:

I can now confirm that Christopher is right about everything (not that I
had any doubts! Just wanted to confirm all is working!!)

ATT is now following the RFC (apparently has changed since November 2016
and June 2017 allocations and DNS changes) and that Route53 WebUI displays
things strangely, however technically works fine on the backend. rDNS is
now working properly. Thank you Christopher very much! I learned a lot in
the last hour I can sure say that!

Matt



On Oct 4, 2017, at 11:20 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
wrote:



On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Matt Peterman <mpeterman () apple com
<mailto:mpeterman () apple com>> wrote:
Got it! You’re the winner here. I just setup both of my zones the name
way and obviously AT&T changed the way they did RDNS entries from when I
got a /25 last November and this second /25 in June. Oh well!

Now I am running into the challenge of Route53 does seem to support
creating an authoritative zone for "128/25.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa.” It
changes it to "128\05725.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa.” every time… *sigh* If
it isn't one thing its something else.


I've not messed with route53 but fortunately you are treading on well
trodden ground:
  https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=674778 <
https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=674778>

have a happy evening! (and I hope that the above works.. again I haven't
and can't actually try it)




Current thread: