nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS PATH limits
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:08:48 +0200
Den 2. okt. 2017 00.44 skrev "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com>: looks to me as if 262206 is trying a silly tactic to down-pref inbound from cogent. as cogent probably prefers customers to peers, it may not be working as 262206 expected, so they keep pounding with the same hammer hoping for a miracle. cogent accepts it as they are being paid to do so; normal practice. perhaps our ire should be directed at 262206, not cogent? has anyone tried to contact them? randy It is amazing how well the DFZ works given half the participants (*) have no clue how. If that is what they want, all they need is to split that /23 into two /24 and only announce that on their other transit. (*) I should probably include myself in that half. Regards Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: AS PATH limits Randy Bush (Oct 01)
- Re: AS PATH limits Baldur Norddahl (Oct 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AS PATH limits Jörg Kost (Oct 02)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Oct 02)
- Re: AS PATH limits Ken Chase (Oct 13)
- Re: AS PATH limits Job Snijders (Oct 13)