nanog mailing list archives
Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers
From: Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:55:18 -0600
On 10/13/2017 2:42 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
Funny how NANOG posts seem to precede actual attention from vendors isn't it.
Squeaky wheel, grease. Same reason why it takes me berating companies on Twitter publicly before things actually get done.
*Stares directly at Verizon for a previous incident where rejection message from an e-mail block said to e-mail a support address to get removed, but support address has same filters and blocked unblocked request*
-- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
Current thread:
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers, (continued)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers Andrew Latham (Oct 11)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers Chuck Anderson (Oct 11)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers Jörg Kost (Oct 11)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers William Herrin (Oct 11)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers Baldur Norddahl (Oct 11)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers William Herrin (Oct 11)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers Andrew Latham (Oct 11)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers Keith Stokes (Oct 12)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers David Hubbard (Oct 13)
- RE: Temp at Level 3 data centers Naslund, Steve (Oct 13)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers Brielle Bruns (Oct 13)
- Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers Matthew Pounsett (Oct 12)