nanog mailing list archives
RE: Broadcast television in an IP world
From: Tom Carter <m1enrage () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:12:25 -0700
As much as that would make sense, there are minimum penetration requirements in contracts, particularly for ESPN. It's going to take a lot of pain on all sides to change those contracts going forward to make Sports as an extra package entirely. On Nov 20, 2017 8:14 AM, "Matthew Black" <Matthew.Black () csulb edu> wrote:
Right now only 25% of cable subscribers watch sports channels like ESPN. But 100% pay up to $20 a month for ESPN et al. in their monthly subscription fees. HBO and Showtime subscribers pay for those premium services. It is well past time for sports enthusiasts to pay for their very expensive content in a sports premium package. -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Luke Guillory Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 3:02 PM To: Jean-Francois Mezei; nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: Broadcast television in an IP world This use to be the case. While it might lower OPX that surely won't result in lower retrans, will just be more profit for them. We're down as well on video subs, this is 99% due to rising prices. This is where it's heading for sure, in the end it will cost more as well since each will be charging more than the per sub rates we're getting charge. They'll have to in order to keep revenue the same. When ESPN offers an OTT product I have no doubt it will be near the $20 per month, for 5 channels or so? Luke Guillory Vice President – Technology and Innovation Tel: 985.536.1212 Fax: 985.536.0300 Email: lguillory () reservetele com Reserve Telecommunications 100 RTC Dr Reserve, LA 70084 ____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________ Disclaimer: The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. .
Current thread:
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world, (continued)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 17)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Wayne Bouchard (Nov 18)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Matthew Black (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Matthew Black (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Matthew Black (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Luke Guillory (Nov 20)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Seth Mattinen (Nov 20)
- RE: Broadcast television in an IP world Tom Carter (Nov 21)
- Re: Broadcast television in an IP world Mike Hammett (Nov 23)