nanog mailing list archives

Re: Question to Google


From: Matt Mathis via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 07:11:56 -0700

One badly configured mid sized ISP might blow search's entire failure
budget.  (Read the SRE book.)

I have been trying for years to get somebody to do a measurement to show
that properly configured dual stack generally has better user QoE than
either protocol alone, largely because CGN doesn't scale well enough.

Thanks,
--MM--
The best way to predict the future is to create it.  - Alan Kay

Privacy matters!  We know from recent events that people are using our
services to speak in defiance of unjust governments.   We treat privacy and
security as matters of life and death, because for some users, they are.

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:

It wouldn't suprise me if the dispute between Google and Cogent was
not part of the issue.  Pure speculation on my part.  I could be
completely off base.

here in japan, if you are using ntt bflets layer two, your layer three
provider is likely to present you with a dns server which does not
return AAAAs because the v6 connectivity over ntt bflets transport sucks
caterpillar snot.

it's a whacky world.  as geoff said long ago, if there ever is real
money counting on v6 transport, these messes will straighten out.

randy



Current thread: