Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent

[Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU>]

Define "good" vs. "bad" transport of bits.  As long as there is
adequate bandwidth and low latency, who cares?

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:30:37PM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> That will have the effect of prioritizing Cogent routes as that would be
> more specific than the default routes from the other providers. Cogent are
> not that good that you would want to do that.
>
> Den 2. mar. 2017 20.16 skrev "Jeff Waddell" <jeff+nanog () waddellsolutions com
> > :
>
> Or at least ask for a full view from Cogent - then you won't get any routes
> they don't have
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alarig Le Lay <alarig () swordarmor fr> wrote:
>
> > On jeu.  2 mars 12:36:04 2017, Aaron Gould wrote:
> > > Well, I asked my (3) upstream providers to only send me a ipv6 default
> > > route and they sent me ::/0...here's one of them...
> >
> > Why did you don’t ask for a full view? With that, you can easily deal
> > with that kind of problem.