nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP peering question
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 19:48:30 +0200
* bryan () shout net (Bryan Holloway) [Tue 11 Jul 2017, 19:28 CEST]:
Also worth looking at your telemetries to see if it makes sense from an inbound/outbound point of view.That is, you'll get more bang for your buck if you're eyeballs and peering with a content provider (or vice versa), as opposed to eyeballs <-> eyeballs or content <-> content.
Luckily these are not exclusionary so you can peer with all networks present at an Internet exchange with no repercussions.
-- Niels.
Current thread:
- BGP peering question craig washington (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Bryan Holloway (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Niels Bakker (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Nick Hilliard (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Wolfgang Tremmel (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question David Hofstee (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question cyrus ramirez via NANOG (Jul 12)
- Re: BGP peering question Bryan Holloway (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Bob Evans (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Ethan E. Dee (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 11)
- Re: BGP peering question William Herrin (Jul 11)