nanog mailing list archives

Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment


From: Michael Still <stillwaxin () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:48:02 -0500

Hi, a few years back some in the community got together to write this:

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Matthew Crocker <matthew () corp crocker com>
wrote:


Hello,

I’m AS7849 and I have an IP problem.

I’m running IPv4 ( /16 legacy + /20) and have enough space to last me for
a while,  multi-homed, BGP4 full tables + peering, ect.
I have some new shiny Juniper MX480s (RE-S-2X00x6, 64MB RAM) in my core.

I want to start building my IPv6 infrastructure.

I have a /32 assigned from ARIN (2001:4918::/32)

I’m looking for some direction/reading list of how to properly configure
IPv6.  I’ve read to use a /64 for PtP interfaces and I’ve read use a /128
instead.    Assign all loopbacks from the same /64, use a different /64 for
each loopback. Ect, ect.

I’m trying not to light a religious war but what is the current best
practice for IPv6 deployment in a service provider network?

PS.  I’ll be at NANOG69 in DC next month,  1st NANOG for me after 22
years.  ☺

-Matt

--
Matthew Crocker
Crocker Communications, Inc.
President




-- 
[stillwaxin () gmail com ~]$ cat .signature
cat: .signature: No such file or directory
[stillwaxin () gmail com ~]$


Current thread: