nanog mailing list archives

Re: SHA1 collisions proven possisble


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:03:34 -0500

On Feb 23, 2017, at 2:59 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:27 AM Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 () gmail com> wrote:

Coworker passed this on to me.

Looks like SHA1 hash collisions are now achievable in a reasonable time
period
https://shattered.io/

-Grant


Good thing we "secure" our routing protocols with MD5

MD5 on BGP considered Harmful.

:)

:-)

More seriously: The attack (or at least as much as we can glean from the blog post) cannot find a collision (file with 
same hash) from an arbitrary file. The attack creates two files which have the same hash, which is scary, but not as 
bad as it could be.

For instance, someone cannot take Verisign’s root cert and create a cert which collides on SHA-1. Or at least we do not 
think they can. We’ll know in 90 days when Google releases the code.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


Current thread: