Re: RPKI coverage statistics

[Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>]

On 21/02/2017 08:22, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG wrote:
> I am trying to solve the problem of BGP IP prefix hijack detection for the
> AS we own using RPKI system.
> But IP addresses covered under RPKI system is very less under 10%.
> How is community dealing with UNKNOWN state for the prefixes when queried
> against RPKI system.
Suggest reading:
https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/3_Gilad_Are_We_There_v1.pdf
from NANOG 69 earlier this month.

Regards,
Hank


> Reply from the community members shows that majority are using RPKI system.
> Is community using anyother methods on top of RPKI ?
>
> Regards,
> Nagarjun
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:31 PM Alex Band <alexb () ripe net> wrote:
>
> > Hi Nagarjun,
> >
> > You can find some statistics on adoption, coverage and quality here:
> >
> > http://certification-stats.ripe.net
> >
> > https://lirportal.ripe.net/certification/content/static/statistics/world-roas.html
> > http://rpki.surfnet.nl
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Alex Band
> >
> > > On 20 Feb 2017, at 06:52, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > where can I found the current coverage of IP prefixes under RPKI system.
> > > Stats like total prefixes issued collectively by all the organisations
> > like
> > > RIR's/IANA/ISP's.
> > > stats like prefixes coverd under RPKI system.
> > >
> > > The goal is to detect the BGP IP prefix hijacking using RPKI system.
> > > I would like to know the coverage before adopting RPKI system.
> > >
> > > I would like to know the suggestions from the community on using this
> > > system.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Nagarjun