nanog mailing list archives
Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again
From: Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:59:29 +0000 (UTC)
This is the sort of mail, based on stolen address books from numerous sites and sometimes on mined Facebook data, that the same spam group has been sending since mid 2013. At some point in 2016 they started permuting the data; previously, if A's addressbook had been stolen, the mail always came "From:" A, but now if A's addressbook had B and C in it, the mail might be "From:" B to C. It is of course possible that they have new sources of data, although I haven't seen any particular evidence of that recently. (I have seen evidence that they have moderately increased competence in getting their spam delivered and read, which has been their main problem in recent years.) Addressbook data stays useful until all of your contacts get new email addresses. Elizabeth ZwickyOn Friday, February 10, 2017, 10:34:58 AM PST, Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell () gmail com> wrote:Yes. The names are used in the From: but not the e-mail addresses. The payload is inside SecureServer.net's 43.255.154.0/24 - 43.255.154.125 and 43.255.154.66. Headers follow. Note: I think Anne P. Mitchell is a LinkedIn contact of mine. Message 1) Delivered-To: a.harrowell () gmail com Received: by 10.80.169.228 with SMTP id n91csp49041edc; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:09:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.223.131.34 with SMTP id 31mr179054wrd.119.1486598941445; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:09:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <wolfgang () cziczatka com> Received: from mx21lb.world4you.com (mx21lb.world4you.com. [81.19.149.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p26si10875705wrp.311.2017.02.08.16.09.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:09:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wolfgang () cziczatka com designates 81.19.149.131 as permitted sender) client-ip=81.19.149.131; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of wolfgang () cziczatka com designates 81.19.149.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=wolfgang () cziczatka com Received: from [117.243.182.154] (helo=dydt-PC) by mx21lb.world4you.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <wolfgang () cziczatka com>) id 1cbcIF-0005OX-87; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 01:09:00 +0100 From: Brandon Galbraith <wolfgang () cziczatka com> To: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell () gmail com>, "Nathanael C. Cariaga" <nccariaga () stluke com ph>, aduitsis <aduitsis () gmail com>, David Ulevitch <davidu () everydns net> Subject: take a look at that Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 00:08:49 +0000 Message-ID: <1514273443.20170209030849 () cziczatka com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_017DBA64.1747A7CE" Content-Language: en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes X-AV-Do-Run: Yes X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 117.243.182.154 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wolfgang () cziczatka com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mx21lb.world4you.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false ------=_NextPart_000_0016_017DBA64.1747A7CE Message 2) Delivered-To: a.harrowell () gmail com Received: by 10.80.169.228 with SMTP id n91csp50480edc; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:14:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.28.135.82 with SMTP id j79mr18959559wmd.19.1486599261495; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:14:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <info () ocreschauvin fr> Received: from smtp.nfrance.com (smtp-4.nfrance.com. [80.247.229.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f124si4142408wmd.153.2017.02.08.16.14.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 80.247.229.46 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of info () ocreschauvin fr) client-ip=80.247.229.46; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 80.247.229.46 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of info () ocreschauvin fr) smtp.mailfrom=info () ocreschauvin fr Received: from tqzb-PC (unknown [197.45.161.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nfrance.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28E1612D7A7; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 01:14:18 +0100 (CET) From: Owen DeLong <info () ocreschauvin fr> To: Brian Mengel <bmengel () gmail com>, Andrew Latham <lathama () gmail com>, Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell () gmail com>, "Anne P. Mitchell Esq." <amitchell () isipp com> Subject: do you have any ideas? Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 06:14:13 +0600 Message-ID: <1846552645.20170209031413 () ocreschauvin fr> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005C_010D479E.32101F4A" Content-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 80.247.229.46 ------=_NextPart_000_005C_010D479E.32101F4A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RGVhciBmcmllbmQhIA0KDQpJJ3ZlIGJlZW4gd3JpdGluZyBhbiAgYXJ0aWNsZSBhbmQgSSd2ZSBj b21lIGFjcm9zcyB0aGF0ICBzdHJhbmdlICBzdHVmZiwgIGRvIHlvdSBoYXZlICBhbnkgIGlkZWFz IHdoYXQgY291bGQgaXQgYmU/IEp1c3QgdGFrZSBhICBsb29rIGh0dHA6Ly9tYXgudHJpcHN0aXht ZW1vcmllcy5jb20vZjRmNQ0KDQpCZXN0IHdpc2hlcywgT3dlbiBEZUxvbmcNCg0K ------=_NextPart_000_005C_010D479E.32101F4A ------=_NextPart_000_005C_010D479E.32101F4A-- On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com
wrote:
Or a nanog member might be infected and the malware is scraping his mailbox for bogus froms. Got headers? On 10/02/17, 9:40 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Alexander Harrowell" < nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of a.harrowell () gmail com> wrote: I'm getting suspicious e-mail pretending to come from leading NANOGers. Not the first time this has happened, but you may want to be warned. Yours, Alex Harrowell
Current thread:
- Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Alexander Harrowell (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Josh Luthman (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Alexander Harrowell (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Andrew Latham (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Rich Kulawiec (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again valdis . kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Andrew Latham (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Alexander Harrowell (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG (Feb 10)
- Re: Someone's scraping NANOG for phishing purposes again Josh Luthman (Feb 10)