nanog mailing list archives
Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:21:56 -0500
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:36:51 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
PD is designed so that a device (router) can request multiple PD requests upstream. The interior router just needs to make a upstream request on behalf of the downstream device and any prefixes it will be allocating itself.
OK, I obviously missed that part of the RFC, I was under the impression that a "middle" router would be carving out of its own PD, rather than relaying the downstream request upstream.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too), (continued)
- Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Stephen Satchell (Dec 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) sizone!math (Dec 30)
- Re: Threads that never end Large Hadron Collider (Dec 30)
- Re: Threads that never end (was: Waste will kill ipv6 too) Randy Bush (Dec 30)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Brock Tice (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too valdis . kletnieks (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Lyndon Nerenberg (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Ricky Beam (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Mark Andrews (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too bzs (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Owen DeLong (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too bzs (Dec 28)
- Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too Large Hadron Collider (Dec 28)