nanog mailing list archives
Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM
From: Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:55:27 -0700
On 11/29/2017 11:03 AM, valdis.kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
Only 90% should be considered horribly broken. Anything that makes it difficult to run a simple mailing list with less that at least 2 or 3 9's is unacceptable.
There have been a number of things that fall into that category, two of which immediately come to mind are:
- Requiring Reverse DNS - SPFI'm not commenting about the viability of these things, just that they are fairly well accepted and that they can trivially break mailing lists.
IMHO, DKIM and DMARC are just the recent additions to that list. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Eric Kuhnke (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Blake Hudson (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM William Herrin (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Stephen Frost (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM William Herrin (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Ken O'Driscoll (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Michael Thomas (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM valdis . kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM William Herrin (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John Levine (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Grant Taylor via NANOG (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM John R. Levine (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Stephen Frost (Dec 01)
- Re: Incoming SMTP in the year 2017 and absence of DKIM Blake Hudson (Dec 01)