nanog mailing list archives
Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings
From: Alexander Lyamin <la () qrator net>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 18:12:28 +0300
Yep. We're the ones to blame. There is known bug. Give us couple more days. Would normally take few hours to fix, but we have Peering Forum on hands. P.S. There is CONTACT US button on page to report bugs, way more reliable way to submit bugs and additional thanks to Job for pointing me up to this thread. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 5:06 AM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
Does anyone use this site much? Has something happened to reduce their visibility? I've noticed multiple networks that had massive drops in peerings on or around March 11, 2017. AS5650 went from 66 to 12. AS53828 went from 436 to 19. PCH's AS3856 looking glass still reports adjacencies to both of those ASes. AS3856 went from 183 adjacencies to 113 that same day (and didn't bounce back). It seems rather unlikely that PCH would lose that much, given that their goal is to collect route table information. Even more odd that those two ASNs would also lose a ton of peers the same day. Thoughts? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP
-- Alexander Lyamin CEO | Qrator <http://qrator.net/>* Labs* office: 8-800-3333-LAB (522) mob: +7-916-9086122 skype: melanor9 mailto: la () qrator net
Current thread:
- Qrator Radar - Peerings Mike Hammett (Dec 05)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Yang Yu (Dec 05)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Mike Hammett (Dec 06)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Job Snijders (Dec 06)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Alexander Azimov (Dec 08)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Mike Hammett (Dec 06)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Yang Yu (Dec 05)
- Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Alexander Lyamin (Dec 06)