nanog mailing list archives
RE: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption
From: <tony () wicks co nz>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 08:00:02 +1300
- Juniper MXs The reason I wrote M7i instead of the MX was I far as I looked on the Juniper site, it seems to use more power than the M7i (though you get more performance). The M150 has just been released, if its within the budget I wold suggest it will very nicely fit the requirement with its 1U form factor and 365W draw. - https://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/routing/mx-series/mx150/
Current thread:
- Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption, (continued)
- Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Mike Hammett (Dec 05)
- Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Seth Mattinen (Dec 05)
- Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Robert Bays (Dec 06)
- Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption William Herrin (Dec 04)
- RE: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Naslund, Steve (Dec 04)
- RE: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption C. Jon Larsen (Dec 04)
- Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Jerry Jones (Dec 05)
- RE: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Adam Greene (Dec 22)
- RE: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Naslund, Steve (Dec 04)
- RE: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption tony (Dec 05)
- Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Colin Baker (Dec 05)
- RE: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption tony (Dec 05)
- Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption Colin Baker (Dec 05)