Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption

[mike.lyon () gmail com]

What hardware you running the CHR on?

> On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:29, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
>
> I'm replacing an M10i with a CHR. 
>
> I hope you have a newer RE so that you don't have worse BGP convergence than a CCR. 
>
>
>
>
> ----- 
> Mike Hammett 
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> http://www.ics-il.com 
>
> Midwest-IX 
> http://www.midwest-ix.com 
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "mike lyon" <mike.lyon () gmail com> 
> To: tony () wicks co nz 
> Cc: nanog () nanog org 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 12:11:27 PM 
> Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption 
>
> Unfortunately, yes. Thats why two Juniper M7is just arrived on my doorstep yesterday... 
>
> > On Dec 5, 2017, at 10:10, <tony () wicks co nz> <tony () wicks co nz> wrote: 
> >
> > Is that actually still true nowadays ? Of course there is always the option of running RouterOS on an X86 for an 
> > effective solution as well. 
> >
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: mike.lyon () gmail com [mailto:mike.lyon () gmail com] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, 6 December 2017 7:07 AM 
> > To: tony () wicks co nz 
> > Cc: nanog () nanog org 
> > Subject: Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption 
> >
> > Bad thing about the CCRs is that their BGP process is single threaded. So even though it has a bunch of cores, it 
> > doesn’t utilize them for BGP. 
> >
> > -Mike