nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent BCP-38


From: "marcel.duregards--- via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:13:41 +0200

Really surprised that AS174 put in place any anti-spoofing.
We are bgp-transit customer of CGNT and received traffic originated from
RFC1918 on our public p2p link with them

On 15.08.2017 17:36, Ben Russell wrote:
Could someone from Cogent contact me off-list?  We are having an issue with one of our downstream customers who is 
multi-homed to another carrier.  The end customer is advertising their prefix to both us and the other carrier.  Both 
us and the other carrier peer with 174.  However, if the prefix is preferred through us and the outbound traffic 
flows over the other carrier it is dropped.  We suspect uRPF-strict on the other carriers Cogent link.   We are 
working together with the other carrier and have a ticket open the help desk seem to be confused.  Any help would be 
appreciated.  Thanks


Ben Russell
Senior Network Engineer
Stratus Networks
(309)370-3174
[logo]


Current thread: