nanog mailing list archives
Re: 100G - Whitebox
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 06:33:24 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Mostly you can engineer around this, but it's not as simple as saying that small-buffer switches aren't suitable for an IXP.
Could you please elaborate on this?How do you engineer around having basically no buffers at all, and especially if these very small buffers are shared between ports.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- 100G - Whitebox Mike Hammett (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Joel Jaeggli (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Mike Hammett (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Raymond Burkholder (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Mike Hammett (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Bill Woodcock (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Fredrik Korsbäck (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Nick Hilliard (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Nick Hilliard (Aug 21)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Coyo Stormcaller (Aug 21)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Fredrik Korsbäck (Aug 20)
- Re: 100G - Whitebox Joel Jaeggli (Aug 20)