nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ?
From: Theodore Baschak <theodore () ciscodude net>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:56:09 -0500
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 8:47 AM, root <junosiosxr () gmail com> < junosiosxr () gmail com> wrote:
Hi, Am i right ? Policy for ipv4 accept and send upto /24 Policy for ipv6 accept and send upto /48
Sending up to a /24 is an oversimplification in today's post-IPv4 exhaustion world. ARIN now has a "Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6 Deployment" (23.128.0.0/10) from which they are may allocate in /24 thru /28 sized blocks. RIPE has tested visibility of longer than /24's and reported on that in 2014 and 2015, both with and without IRR entries. https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/propagation-of-longer-than-24-ipv4-prefixes and https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/has-the-routability-of-longer-than-24-prefixes-changed Theodore Baschak - AS395089 - Hextet Systems https://bgp.guru/ - https://hextet.net/ http://mbix.ca/ - http://mbnog.ca/
Current thread:
- ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ? root <junosiosxr () gmail com> (Apr 27)
- Re: ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ? Seth Mattinen (Apr 27)
- Re: ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ? Job Snijders (Apr 27)
- Re: ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ? Theodore Baschak (Apr 27)
- Re: ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ? Max Tulyev (Apr 27)
- Re: ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ? Yuya KAWAKAMI (Apr 28)
- Re: ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ? Seth Mattinen (Apr 27)