nanog mailing list archives
Re: comcast and msoft ports
From: Filip Hruska <fhr () fhrnet eu>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:25:04 +0200
If you really need them, you'll need to use some sort of tunneling mechanism, ie PPTP.
Regards, Filip On 11.9.2016 21:21, Ryan, Spencer wrote:
Having those ports exposed to the Internet is scary. Comcast is right in blocking them. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com> Date: 9/11/16 2:48 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: comcast and msoft ports sigh. well that was some fun hours debugging; not. thanks randy
Current thread:
- comcast and msoft ports Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Ca By (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- RE: comcast and msoft ports Ryan, Spencer (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Filip Hruska (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Ca By (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Jared Mauch (Sep 12)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Jared Mauch (Sep 12)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Ca By (Sep 11)
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: comcast and msoft ports Gregg Heimer (Sep 12)