nanog mailing list archives
Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193
From: Yang Yu <yang.yu.list () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 21:53:21 -0500
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
NAT is bad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v26BAlfWBm8
Current thread:
- Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Pshem Kowalczyk (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Mark Andrews (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Pshem Kowalczyk (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Josh Reynolds (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Mark Andrews (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Pshem Kowalczyk (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Karl Auer (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Ryan, Spencer (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Pshem Kowalczyk (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Mark Andrews (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Ca By (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Yang Yu (Sep 08)
- Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193 Octavio Alvarez (Sep 09)