nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:04:13 +0300
On 13/09/2016 23:22, Blake Hudson wrote:
Ca By wrote on 9/13/2016 2:53 PM:On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Bryant Townsend <bryant () backconnect com> wrote: Tip to the RIR policy folks, you may want to make this point very crisp. A BGP ASN is the fundamental accountability control in a inter-domain routing. Organizations with repeated offensense need to have their ASN revoked, and further there should be controls in places so bad actors cannot acquire "burner" ASNs.
The RIRs have made it very clear that they will not get involved. Period. -Hank
Current thread:
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?, (continued)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Ryan, Spencer (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Blake Hudson (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Mel Beckman (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Doug Montgomery (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Ca By (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Sandra Murphy (Sep 14)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Ca By (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Blake Hudson (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hank Nussbacher (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Hugo Slabbert (Sep 13)
- Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking? Bryant Townsend (Sep 13)