nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?
From: George William Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 18:43:58 -0700
On Oct 21, 2016, at 6:35 PM, Eitan Adler <lists () eitanadler com> wrote: [...] In practice TTLs tend to be ignored on the public internet. In past research I've been involved with browser[0] behavior was effectively random despite the TTL set. [0] more specifically, the chain of DNS resolution and caching down to the browser.
Yes, but that it can be both better and worse than your TTLs does not mean that you can ignore properly working implementations. If the other end device chain breaks you that's their fault and out of your control. If your own settings break you that's your fault. Sent from my iPhone
Current thread:
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?, (continued)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Randy Bush (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? David Birdsong (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Randy Bush (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Niels Bakker (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Måns Nilsson (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Keenan Tims (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Rob Szarka (Oct 22)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? david raistrick (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Jean-Francois Mezei (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Eitan Adler (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? George William Herbert (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Masood Ahmad Shah (Oct 22)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Mark Andrews (Oct 23)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? LHC (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? LHC (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Eitan Adler (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Suzanne Woolf (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? joel jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Måns Nilsson (Oct 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Måns Nilsson (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Crist Clark (Oct 21)