nanog mailing list archives
CGNAT - Seeking Real World Experience
From: Adam <adamkuj () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:17:01 -0500
I'm crunching the numbers on the cost effectiveness of implementing CGN vs IPv4 auctions. The determining factor is how many ephemeral ports are reserved for each customer. This is for a residential broadband environment. Is anybody doing deterministic NAT/PAT (i.e. each customer gets X ports - no more, no less)? My thinking is that X=8192 would cover even the power users. However, with only 8 customers per public IPv4 address, CGN is not worth the trouble. With X=8192, our money and time would better be spent acquiring additional IPv4 space. Are people successfully using a smaller deterministic port allocation? What's your X? If I can't make the numbers work for deterministic NAT, I might be able to live with dynamic port assignments. Specifically, I'm referring to what vendor J calls "Port Block Allocation". I was thinking 1024 ports per block, with up to 8 blocks per customer (and a bunch of log correlation to determine who was using which ip:port tuple at a given datetime). I *can* make the math work out in favor of CGN if the average customer uses <= 3072 ports (3 blocks). But is that going to be enough? I'd love to hear other people's experiences. Thanks! -Adam
Current thread:
- CGNAT - Seeking Real World Experience Adam (Nov 24)
- Re: CGNAT - Seeking Real World Experience Ca By (Nov 24)
- Re: CGNAT - Seeking Real World Experience Stepan Kucherenko (Nov 25)
- Re: CGNAT - Seeking Real World Experience Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Nov 27)