nanog mailing list archives

Re: [c-nsp] SFP DOM SNMP Polling?


From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:39:50 +0000

Michael,

I totally missed the fact that reads don’t stress EEPROMs! <blush>

Excellent point, and makes the vendor’s claim totally bogus.

Probably just one employees claim, but the vendor should step up and fix the real problem.

 -mel


On Nov 22, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Michael Loftis <mloftis () wgops com> wrote:

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com> wrote:
I have a vendor that does not support SFP DOM SNMP polling. They state this
is due to EEPROM read life cycle. Constant reads will damage the SFP.

Complete and total garbage.  Reading from EEPROM and Flash both DO NOT
WEAR.  It is the erase+write cycle that wears them.  Further typical
EEPROM life cycle is ~1M erase/write cycles.  If you wrote it every
minute you could conceivably wear it out in a couple years...but thats
flat out not how it works.  The EEPROM, if any, is not going to be
used for statistics data....maybe fail counts of some kind, lifetime
(hours) maybe...that sort of thing.



We SNMP poll SFP DOM from Cisco equipment without issue.

Not heard this one before. Trying to see if there is some validity to the
statement. Thoughts?

Tim:>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp () puck nether net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



-- 

"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler


Current thread: