nanog mailing list archives

Re: MPLS Reference Designs

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 23:52:05 +0200



On 27/May/16 20:36, Alain Hebert wrote:


    ( Obviously interoperability is just ridiculous when talking MPLS... )


Why would you think so?


    Too many times we ended up finding boxes that look the part but are
limited in such a way to accomplish only the task that fit the vendor
own MPLS paradigm.
    ( TLDR: Make us spend more $$$ than needed =D long gone is the
swiss-knife concept )


What platforms have you worked on before that have caused you grief?

Mark.

Current thread:

Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Mohamed Kamal (May 27)
- RE: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Timothy Creswick (May 27)
  - Re: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Mohamed Kamal (May 27)
    - MPLS Reference Designs Alain Hebert (May 27)
    - Re: MPLS Reference Designs Mark Tinka (May 27)
    - Re: Preferring RSVP for only one l2circuit. Mark Tinka (May 27)