nanog mailing list archives
Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 08:58:13 +0200
On 24/May/16 08:51, Jared Mauch wrote:
I’ve seen optical transport gear be non-transparent in a few situations when using OTU2 vs OTU2e, but they turned out to be a bug.
I've seen this as well, including in an SDH transport, where OSPF packets were being eaten (something Multicast-related).
If a L2 platform is being used to front-end a router, you could be seeing slow protocols like CDP/LLDP/LACP being consumed by that switch. If you configure LLDP does it pass end-to-end?
That's what I was thinking at first when I read the OP's post. If the circuit is being transported over MPLS or being fronted by an Ethernet switch, Level(3) would have to tunnel Layer 2 protocols in order to support your LACP frames across the pw. Mark.
Current thread:
- LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Colton Conor (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Jared Mauch (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Mark Tinka (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Rob Laidlaw (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Mark Tinka (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Eric Kuhnke (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Mark Tinka (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Jared Mauch (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Colton Conor (May 23)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG (May 24)
- Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport Eygene Ryabinkin (May 24)