nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST NTP servers
From: Mike <the.lists () mgm51 com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 10:16:40 -0400
On 5/11/2016 11:24 AM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
----- Original Message -----From: "Jared Mauch" <jared () puck nether net>Yes, and properly monitor your ntpd instances.And upgrade them. Some software distributors don’t ship modern software. if you are using a distribution packaged ntpd it’s likely old and difficult to determine its lineage due to how it’s packaged. If you’re using Redhat based systems consider using chrony instead, even the new beta fedora 24 uses 4.2.6 derived code vs 4.2.8We're all aware this project is underway, right? https://www.ntpsec.org/
Speaking of nascent time projects http://nwtime.org/projects/ntimed/ So far, I like the overall architecture of the client/slave/master task differentiation. I've played around with the client in a test environment and ~it seems to work OK~, but it looks like the project is still a bit in the future.
Current thread:
- Re: NIST NTP servers, (continued)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Sharon Goldberg (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Sharon Goldberg (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Harlan Stenn (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Harlan Stenn (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Andreas Ott (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Jay R. Ashworth (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Majdi S. Abbas (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Jared Mauch (May 12)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mike (May 12)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Gary E. Miller (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Eygene Ryabinkin (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Gary E. Miller (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Lyndon Nerenberg (May 11)