nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPV6 planning
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 16:54:58 -0500
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 23:46:59 +0200, Mark Tinka said:
If you want IPv6 DNS resolvers, DHCPv6 is a good option, which means a hybrid of DHCPv6 and SLAAC is reasonable.
And note that there isn't any problem with a machine getting an IPv6 address via SLAAC *and* getting another one via DHCPv6 - my laptop is doing that as I type (plus a privacy address or two as well).
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- IPV6 planning Laurent Dumont (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Mark Tinka (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Baldur Norddahl (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Hugo Slabbert (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Owen DeLong (Mar 07)
- Re: IPV6 planning Mark Tinka (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Karl Auer (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Saku Ytti (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Karl Auer (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Saku Ytti (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Tore Anderson (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Karl Auer (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Baldur Norddahl (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Saku Ytti (Mar 05)