Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge

[ML-NANOG-Stefan-Jakob <nanog () yacl net>]

Hi Mark,

Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> schrieb am So., 28. Feb. 2016 07:13:

> On 3/Feb/16 09:58, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> > Typically the features that fall by the wayside first are: reasonable
> > port buffers, qos knobs and decent lag/ecmp hashing support for mpls
> > packets.
>
> Cisco, in general, are suffering here, i.e., QoS on LAG's.
>
> IOS, IOS XE and IOS XR suffer massively.
>
> We find that Junos does a better job here.
>
> Mark.

Do yo have more details what's wrong with the XR platform?

Which hardware do we talk about and which XR version is your statement
applying?

Rgds, Stefan

>