nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper MX Sizing
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:01:15 +0200
On 14/Mar/16 14:35, Colton Conor wrote:
Mark, You are right that makes sense. So as a recap, you were seeing about 45 seconds route convergence time using RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM. For a MX104 it took 4min 25sec. I assume a MX80 would be even slower than an MX104. What about a MX480 with RE-2000's with 4GB of ram? Does anyone have any stats on that? I would assume faster than a MX104 but slower than the RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM.
I don't have empirical data, but yes, the MX80 and MX104 will be way slower across the board. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Colton Conor (Mar 13)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Mark Tinka (Mar 13)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Colton Conor (Mar 14)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Mark Tinka (Mar 14)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Colton Conor (Mar 14)
- Re: Juniper MX Sizing Mark Tinka (Mar 13)