nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 08:04:02 +0200
On 1/Mar/16 17:18, Peter Phaal wrote:
It also appears that Cisco's merchant silicon based switches have a greater variety of orchestration capabilities, Python, NX-API, Ansible, etc.
We were initially looking at at the Nexus 9000, but then moved to the 7700 because the Broadcom chip on the 7700 cannot do single flows larger than 40Gbps on the 100Gbps ports. As a general note, I'm having to avoid merchant silicon left-right-and-centre. Every time I try to give them a chance, they don't cut the mustard. When the next chip solves the last issue, I discover it can't support another feature. The cycle repeats. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nikolay Shopik (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 02)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Peter Phaal (Mar 03)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Mark Tinka (Mar 01)