nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port?
From: Spencer Ryan <sryan () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:02:37 -0400
I would monitor it wherever you would do traffic shaping/policing. If that happens on the CPE monitor it there. If the CPE is just all Layer2 back to a router or whatever and the router is doing rate limiting monitor it there. For circuits that run at wirespeed with no limits (10/100/1000/10k/etc) the same logic applies, just monitor the bandwidth where you would normally do the policing. *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sryan () arbor net *Arbor Networks* +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m) www.arbornetworks.com On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jason Lee <jason.m.lee () gmail com> wrote:
NANOG Community, Typically where would you expect a service provider to monitor bandwidth usage on your circuits? On the physical switch port interface or on the vlan interface at the router? In some of the field testing I've been doing there can be a difference in the bandwidth usage on the vlan interface at the router vs the physical switch port. Is there any particular reason for using one vs the other? Is there an industry best practice for this? Thanks, Jason
Current thread:
- Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Jason Lee (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Spencer Ryan (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Hugo Slabbert (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Mel Beckman (Jun 01)
- Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port? Mark Tinka (Jun 01)