nanog mailing list archives

Re: Tracking traffic usage at router or switch port?


From: Spencer Ryan <sryan () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:02:37 -0400

I would monitor it wherever you would do traffic shaping/policing. If that
happens on the CPE monitor it there. If the CPE is just all Layer2 back to
a router or whatever and the router is doing rate limiting monitor it
there. For circuits that run at wirespeed with no limits
(10/100/1000/10k/etc) the same logic applies, just monitor the bandwidth
where you would normally do the policing.


*Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sryan () arbor net
*Arbor Networks*
+1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
www.arbornetworks.com

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jason Lee <jason.m.lee () gmail com> wrote:

NANOG Community,

Typically where would you expect a service provider to monitor bandwidth
usage on your circuits? On the physical switch port interface or on the
vlan interface at the router? In some of the field testing I've been doing
there can be a difference in the bandwidth usage on the vlan interface at
the router vs the physical switch port. Is there any particular reason for
using one vs the other? Is there an industry best practice for this?

Thanks,

Jason



Current thread: