nanog mailing list archives
Re: 1GE L3 aggregation
From: Colton Conor <colton.conor () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:58:34 -0500
What size FIB/RIB table does that Huawei have? On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Harald F. Karlsen <elfkin () gmail com> wrote:
On 16.06.2016 09:51, Saku Ytti wrote:Hey, I've been bit poking around trying to find reasonable option for 1GE L3 full BGP table aggregator. It seems vendors are mostly pushing Satellite/Fusion for this application. I don't really like the added complexity and tight coupling Satellite/Fusion forces me. I'd prefer standards based routing redundancy to reduce impact of defects. ASR9001 and MX104 are not an options, due to control-plane scale. New boxes in vendor pipeline are completely ignoring 1GE. I've casually talked with other people, and it seems I'm not really alone here. My dream box would be 96xSFP + 2xQSFP28, with pretty much full edge features (BGP, LDP, ISIS, +1M FIB, +5M RIB, per-interface VLANs, ipfix or sflow, at least per-port QoS with shaper, martini pseudowires).What about the Huawei NE20E-S2F/NE40E-M2F? 4 * SFP+ and 40 * SFP fixed ports and two PICs with either 4*SFP+ or 1*QSFP each. Decent FIB. Not really sure about the IPFIX/sflow thought. Pricing seems very aggresive on these devices as well. -- Harald
Current thread:
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation, (continued)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Mark Tinka (Jun 18)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Baldur Norddahl (Jun 18)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation James Jun (Jun 18)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Saku Ytti (Jun 19)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Mark Tinka (Jun 20)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Mark Tinka (Jun 19)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Saku Ytti (Jun 17)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Radu-Adrian Feurdean (Jun 18)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Colton Conor (Jun 17)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Saku Ytti (Jun 17)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Colton Conor (Jun 17)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Saku Ytti (Jun 17)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Colton Conor (Jun 17)
- Re: 1GE L3 aggregation Saku Ytti (Jun 17)