nanog mailing list archives

Re: Thinking Methodically about building a PoC


From: Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:29:51 -0700


On Mon 2016-Jun-13 08:52:41 -0500, Possamai Rafael via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:

This may not be an answer very specific to your problem/question, but if
you take a look at the following image, you will find a summary of what
they called the engineering design methodology:

http://www.cdn.sciencebuddies.org/Files/5083/9/2013-updated_engineering-method-steps_v6b.png

Seriously thought initially that you were going to link to:

http://i2.wp.com/tamingdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/tree-swing-project-management-large.png

You can adapt it to your circumstances, for example: instead of defining a
problem in step 1, you can define a product, and after knowing what is
expected from that product, you can then move to background research, etc.

Hope that helps.


Rafael


--
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo () slabnet com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal



On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Kasper Adel <karim.adel () gmail com> wrote:

hi,

I am asked to build a large lab/test it. I'm provided crazy scale numbers
for lots of technologies (L*VPN, IPv*, IGP*, All Tunnels flavors...etc).

It took me a lot of time to build this lab, because when I got the
request/test plan handed over to me, I did not verify that these scaled
numbers are even possible, not to mention the combination. I assumed some
thought/research were done before.

I'm trying to put together a list of the lessons learned, and the right way
to do this for future reference, specially that this project was time
critical and I got beaten hard because I did not deliver on time.

So my question is, in your extensive experience, what is the right
method/approach to this kind of task:

1) Get started immediately (MVP), things will break, tune it along the way.
2) Do some planning and research first.

I'd appreciate any references to 'software engineering' or other
industries/

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Current thread: