nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sunday night social?
From: Matt Ryanczak <ryanczak () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 06:32:49 -0700
Remember that social != sociable! ~Matt On Jun 12, 2016 15:22, "Todd Underwood" <toddunder () gmail com> wrote: huh. today we learn that social is subject to particular people's view of social. please author an RFC to explain the scope that counts as social. thanks! t On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
This may surprise some, but social != frat boys. randy, on a phoneOn Jun 12, 2016, at 15:08, Todd Underwood <toddunder () gmail com> wrote: surely this is not the same randy bush that loves to point out that humans are social animals! t On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:Is Wednesday night the only social?Yes.damn! if i had known there was a chance of folk acting more like sober adults than the usual frat boys i might have scheduled chicago. randy
Current thread:
- Fwd: Sunday night social? Matthew Petach (Jun 10)
- Re: Sunday night social? Valerie Wittkop (Jun 10)
- Re: Sunday night social? Weir, Colin (Jun 12)
- Re: Sunday night social? Dave Temkin (Jun 12)
- Re: Sunday night social? Randy Bush (Jun 12)
- Re: Sunday night social? Todd Underwood (Jun 12)
- Re: Sunday night social? Randy Bush (Jun 12)
- Re: Sunday night social? Todd Underwood (Jun 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Sunday night social? Matt Ryanczak (Jun 13)
- Re: Sunday night social? Weir, Colin (Jun 12)
- Re: Sunday night social? Valerie Wittkop (Jun 10)
- Re: Sunday night social? Dave Temkin (Jun 12)