nanog mailing list archives
Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare)
From: Ken Chase <math () sizone org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:39:44 -0400
Because replying admits knowledge and creates a papertrail thereof. Esp. w.r.t. copyright infringement takedown notices etc. (or also because said providers are innundated with such requests because they don't actually care as it's all part of their profit centre.) /kc On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 01:35:09PM -0400, Christopher Morrow said: >On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Paras Jha <paras () protrafsolutions com> >wrote: > >> I consistently did not even get replies > > >This is a common 'complaint' point for abuse senders. I often wonder why. >What is a reply supposed to do or tell you? -- Ken Chase - math () sizone org
Current thread:
- RE: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare), (continued)
- RE: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Naslund, Steve (Jul 29)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) J. Oquendo (Jul 29)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Roland Dobbins (Jul 29)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Rich Kulawiec (Jul 29)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Rich Kulawiec (Jul 28)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Paras Jha (Jul 27)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) J. Oquendo (Jul 27)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Christopher Morrow (Jul 27)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Ken Chase (Jul 27)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Justin Paine via NANOG (Jul 27)
- RE: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Naslund, Steve (Jul 28)
- Re: EVERYTHING about Booters (and CloudFlare) Randy Bush (Jul 28)