nanog mailing list archives

Re: MTU


From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 12:17:30 +0200

On 23 July 2016 at 10:28, Tore Anderson <tore () fud no> wrote:

* Baldur Norddahl

What is best practice regarding choosing MTU on transit links?

Until now we have used the default of 1500 bytes. I now have a
project were we peer directly with another small ISP. However we need
a backup so we figured a GRE tunnel on a common IP transit carrier
would work. We want to avoid the troubles you get by having an
effective MTU smaller than 1500 inside the tunnel, so the IP transit
carrier agreed to configure a MTU of 9216.

You use case as described above puzzles me. You should already your
peer's routes being advertised to you via the transit provider and vice
versa. If your direct peering fails, the traffic should start flowing
via the transit provider automatically. So unless there's something
else going on here you're not telling us there should be no need for
the GRE tunnel.


I did not say we were doing internet peering...

In case you are wondering, we are actually running L2VPN tunnels over MPLS.

Regards,

Baldur


Current thread: