nanog mailing list archives
Re: packet loss question
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:50:47 -0400
On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Ken Chase <math () sizone org> wrote:
And we know the whole internet observes handling mtu discovery properly and doesnt just firewall all ICMP because 'hackers'. (OP's issue may well be MTU discovery, esp if he's on broadband. Don't have enough details. I just solved this exact problem a couple weeks ago for a client with an UBNT ERX by turning on it's MTU hacking feature. Sites that engaged in ICMP mtu blocking included cnn.com.)
Heh. And because life isn't interesting enough, Amazon AWS has started defaulting their larger VMs to a 9001 byte interface MTU.
I meant routers are allowed to drop ICMP request packets to themselves, not the packets to be transitted. I wasnt clear.
I think you really meant echo-request packets to themselves, right? ;) Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
Current thread:
- packet loss question Phillip Lynn (Jul 07)
- Re: packet loss question Job Snijders (Jul 07)
- Re: packet loss question Ken Chase (Jul 07)
- Re: packet loss question William Herrin (Jul 07)
- Re: packet loss question Ken Chase (Jul 08)
- Re: packet loss question William Herrin (Jul 08)
- Re: packet loss question jmkeller (Jul 08)
- Re: packet loss question William Herrin (Jul 07)
- Re: packet loss question Phillip Lynn (Jul 08)
- Re: packet loss question Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: packet loss question Mark Andrews (Jul 10)
- Re: packet loss question cpolish (Jul 11)
- Re: packet loss question Sean Donelan (Jul 12)
- Re: packet loss question cpolish (Jul 12)
- Re: packet loss question James R Cutler (Jul 07)