nanog mailing list archives

Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it


From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:31:57 -0800

On 1/25/16 11:06 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
My understanding is this was mostly legacy from devices that did not
carry full Rib and fib. There were tricks to avoid ending up on these
skinny devices if you wanted.

Life in the core has changed a lot in recent years from 6500/7600 and
foundry/brocade class devices to a more interesting set in the
pipeline or released.

There are some limited rib-> fib download boxes that could slice
traffic in cost effective ways that the price conscious consumer will
likely push the market to.

There are also of course variations on this. An an aggregation router
may have quite limited FIB, e.g. enough for customer routes yet still
have a full rib in it's control-plane, at which point it needs to
default towards devices which do have a FIB in place.  assuming a single
hob peering it would be rather hard to identify this case as a customer,
though if your neighbor has an Arista mac address for example that might
be a logical conclusion.

Jared Mauch

On Jan 22, 2016, at 3:28 PM, Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com> wrote:


I have a pending request to get that multi-hop setup. I was told
that it was now a special request and they would "try" to get it
done and these days all their routers had full table capacity and
they no longer used the multi-hop.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Current thread: