nanog mailing list archives

Re: Nat


From: Lee Howard <Lee () asgard org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 11:28:15 -0500



On 1/7/16, 7:39 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Doug Barton"
<nanog-bounces () nanog org on behalf of dougb () dougbarton us> wrote:

On 12/18/2015 01:20 PM, Lee Howard wrote:


On 12/17/15, 1:59 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Matthew Petach"

I'm still waiting for the IETF to come around
to allowing feature parity between IPv4 and IPv6
when it comes to DHCP.  The stance of not
allowing the DHCP server to assign a default
gateway to the host in IPv6 is a big stumbling
point for at least one large enterprise I'm aware
of.


Tell me again why you want this, and not routing information from the
router?

C'mon Lee, stop pretending that you're interested in the answer to this
question, and wasting everyone's time in the process. You know the
answers, just as well as the people who would give them.

I’m flattered that you think I know so much.

Jared gave a useful reply, and I’m doing research before writing an
internet-draft.  



Right now, the biggest obstacle to IPv6
deployment seems to be the ivory-tower types
in the IETF that want to keep it pristine, vs
allowing it to work in the real world.

There¹s a mix of people at IETF, but more operator input there would be
helpful. I have a particular draft in mind that is stuck between ³we¹d
rather delay IPv6 than do it wrong² and ³be realistic about how people
will deploy it."

On this topic the operator input has been clear for over a decade, and
yet the purists have blocked progress this whole time. The biggest
roadblock to IPv6 deployment are its most ardent "supporters."

I don’t think IPv6 evangelists are in the way.
I do think many enterprises don’t care about IPv6, and no protocol changes
will make a difference. Some enterprise administrators wouldn’t mind
deploying IPv6 as long as they don’t have to think about it. I think this
is foolish: deploying a new Internet Protocol will not be simpler than
deploying a new Spanning Tree or a new routing protocol.
There are also enterprise administrators who have technical concerns;
those are the ones I want to help.

Lee




Current thread: