Re: VPLS Providers

[Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>]

On 1/Jan/16 17:19, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> If you're talking a requirement for connecting geographically separated
> locations, there are sound technical reasons for avoiding vpls like the
> plague.  Unless there are overriding technical reasons why it wouldn't
> work, l3vpn will almost always provide a far better quality service.

Almost every time a customer has asked me for VPLS (or EVPN), they've
been just fine with l3vpn as a suggested alternative.

Other customers are all about doing their own routing...

Mark.