nanog mailing list archives

Re: TransPacific Partnership


From: Matt Hoppes <mhoppes () indigowireless com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 19:07:12 -0500

My understanding was if it all goes through here in the US as proposed ISPs would have to provide real time monitoring 
of data   Not as part of CALEA but as part of NSA surveilance. 

On Jan 3, 2016, at 18:54, Tom Berryman <Tom () connectivityit com au> wrote:

G'Day Matt,

I'm here in Australia - and yes we are all well aware of the "benefits" of the TPP.

What do you mean by burned?
As in the additional accounting and administration overhead of doing business with operators in TPP participating 
countries?

Also, will you be attending PTC?


Regards,
Tom Berryman


Tom Berryman | CTO
Connectivity I.T. PTY LTD
ABN: 41128650635

1300 22 46 00 (+61356224600) | tom () connectivityit com au | AS-58511
www.connectivityit.com.au | facebook.com/connectivityit | twitter.com/connectivityit


-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes
Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: TransPacific Partnership

Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?


Current thread: