nanog mailing list archives

Re: Thank you, Comcast.


From: Mikeal Clark <mikeal.clark () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:36:07 -0600

Totally agree.  It's silly that my home lab has to cost me 5x the
normal rate if I want to use some of the standard ports but that is
normal now.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:

In message <alpine.DEB.2.02.1602260718460.11524 () uplift swm pp se>, Mikael Abrah
amsson writes:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Jared Mauch wrote:

Make sure you permit TCP/53 for DNS queries so if TC=1 lookups work.

Speaking of which, historically ISPs have been blocking TCP/135, TCP/445
and a few others towards customers (at least that's what I know). TCP/25
seems to be blocked as well.

Why isn't UDP/53 blocked towards customers? I know historically there were
resolvers that used UDP/53 as source port for queries, but is this the
case nowadays?

I know providers that have blocked UDP/53 towards customers as a
countermeasure to the amplification attacks. As far as I heard, there were
no customer complaints.

Because complaining is like talking to a brick wall most of the
time.  People work around the ISP idiocy by shifting ports, its
easier than trying to get through help desk hell.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: